evaluation


How am I misunderstanding call-by-need evaluation?


First of all, I never studied these things or anything, so I may be asking very silly questions, which I am sorry for, but please go easy on me :)
I'm playing around with implementing lambda calculus, with call-by-need evaluation. I'm trying to follow this paper on the subject, where the relevant bit seems to be the natural semantics described on page 28.
Anyway, what I don't understand about this evaluation strategy is that, as far as I understand, the actual substitution only happens when evaluating variables. Abstractions evaluate to themselves, as these are the values, and applications only add new entries to the cache.
But given that, how exactly one go about evaluating a term like
(λx.λy.x y) λa.a
According to the natural semantics, described in the linked paper, the first evaluation step would be to add the entry x -> λa.a to the cache, and evaluate the body of the abstraction on the lhs of the application, which is λy.x y. But this is a value, so the evaluation ends. At which point we have a term that is not closed, and a non-empty heap. While we know exactly that this term should evaluate to λy.(λa.a) y.
What am I misunderstanding? How does this work in languages that actually use this evaluation strategy?
Your reduction is right. The point is that the call by need strategy addressed in that paper is only a weak strategy, in the sense that it will never reduce under a lambda expression. This is evident in Fig.1, where the expression \x.M is a value.
At the end of the reduction, if you want to obtain a lambda term explicitly, you still need to unwind the cache (frequently called environment in the literature), that amounts to substitute the associations in the cache inside your term:
λy.x y [x -> λa.a] = λy.(λa.a) y
as expected.

Related Links

SyntaxNet evaluation metrics
How am I misunderstanding call-by-need evaluation?
Math notation understanding
What criterias do you look for in a WAF (web application firewall)?
Predictionio evaluation fails with Text Classification template
Evaluation of APL direct functions
Modelica Evaluation Order
how compilers evaluate mathematical expressions? [closed]
What does “top-level evaluation” mean?
Boolean expression evaluation with a given context
Is relying on short-circuit evaluation good design? [closed]
Objectively evaluating new GUI toolkits
what are evaluation techniques for HCI projects (without involving users, or psychologist)?
Evaluating developers [closed]
Options to Common Criteria
What are some useful criteria for deciding on which software package to go for?

Categories

HOME
repository
marie
teradata
itunesconnect
leaflet
system-calls
domain-driven-design
jenkins-pipeline
cxf
blob
liquibase
mifare
mailchimp
browser-cache
promotions
google-my-business-api
oxid
watson-dialog
exchange-transport-agents
web-worker
luis
taxonomy
google-calendar-api3
bug-reporting
dev-c++
lotusscript
javaagents
smali
functional-dependencies
ckeditor4.x
core-animation
my.cnf
pydub
multiple-inheritance
proof-general
ipython-parallel
jbossfuse
slim-lang
contextmenustrip
node-soap
voyager
powerbi-embedded
rythm
observer-pattern
flume-ng
web-technologies
logan-square
spring-webflow-2
perldoc
totalview
rmq
pyautogui
breadcrumbs
joystick
deck.js
transaction-isolation
database-administration
treelist
clique
android-progressbar
code-translation
fadein
clear
dynamics-nav-2013
persian
nmock
grails-3.0.9
parseexception
pymol
conkeror
qf-test
tigase
xts
twitter-finagle
farpoint-spread
slimscroll
android-jack-and-jill
codio
azure-pack
xrandr
friendly-url
pyxplot
backbone-views
mosix
biztalk-deployment
system.transactions
invalidoperationexception
optimistic-concurrency
pinchzoom
scsf
method-call
designated-initializer
llblgen
mysql-logic
konsole
onresize

Resources

Mobile Apps Dev
Database Users
javascript
java
csharp
php
android
MS Developer
developer works
python
ios
c
html
jquery
RDBMS discuss
Cloud Virtualization
Database Dev&Adm
javascript
java
csharp
php
python
android
jquery
ruby
ios
html
Mobile App
Mobile App
Mobile App